Senator Lindsey O. Graham Esq.
- Homepage: http://lgraham.senate.gov/
December 2005: "Lindsey O. Graham was elected to serve as United States Senator on November 5, 2002.
A native South Carolinian, Graham grew up in Central, graduated from D.W. Daniel High School, and earned his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of South Carolina in Columbia.
Graham logged six-and-a-half years of service on active duty as an Air Force lawyer.
From 1984-1988, he was assigned overseas and served at Rhein Mein Air Force Base in Germany. Upon leaving the active duty Air Force in 1989, Graham joined the South Carolina Air National Guard where he served until his election to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1994.
During the first Gulf War, Graham was called to active duty and served state-side at McEntire Air National Guard Base as Staff Judge Advocate where he prepared members for deployment to the Gulf region. His duties included briefing pilots on the law of armed conflict, preparing legal documents for deploying troops, and providing legal services for family members of the South Carolina Air National Guard. He received a commendation medal for his service at McEntire.
Since 1995, Graham has continued to serve his country in the U.S. Air Force Reserves and is the only U.S. Senator currently serving in the Guard or Reserves. He is a colonel and is assigned as a Reserve Judge to the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals.
In 1988, Graham went into private law practice and in 1992 was elected to the South Carolina House of Representatives.
In 1994, he became the first Republican to represent South Carolina's Third Congressional District in Washington since 1877."http://lgraham.senate.gov/index.cfm?mode=bio
December 2013: 'Military retirees are getting "screwed" by a budget deal expected to pass the Senate on Wednesday, said Sen. Lindsey Graham.'http://money.cnn.com/2013/12/18/news/economy/military-pension-budget/index.html
October 2013: 'When Senator Richard M. Burr, a North Carolina Republican, told a reporter that defunding the law was “the dumbest idea I’ve ever heard,” the fund bought a radio ad to attack him. Two other Republican senators up for re-election in 2014, Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, were also targeted. Both face Tea Party challengers.'http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/us/a-federal-budget-crisis-months-in-the-planning.html
November 2012: 'Calling the Palestinian bid “an unhealthy step that could undermine the peace process,” Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, said that he and the other senators, including Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, would be closely monitoring the situation.'http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/30/world/middleeast/Palestinian-Authority-United-Nations-Israel.html
February 2011: "Mr. Smith and other Republicans on the Judiciary Committee have pledged to block any legislation giving legal status to illegal immigrants, which they reject as amnesty for lawbreakers. Still, as Politico first reported on Monday, Senators Charles E. Schumer of New York, a Democrat, and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a Republican, have begun preliminary talks to see whether there is enough support in Congress to try to pass a comprehensive immigration overhaul in coming months."http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/09/us/09immigration.html
May 2010: 'Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina and an influential lawmaker in the long-running debate over detentions, called the ruling a “big win” and praised the administration for appealing the lower court’s ruling.'http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/22/world/asia/22detain.html
October 2007: A Republican on the committee, Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, praised Mr. Mukasey’s response, saying: “I think Judge Mukasey did himself some good with this letter. He helped his cause with me.”http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/31/washington/31mukasey.html
October 2007: Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), a Senate Judiciary Committee member and military lawyer who has frequently criticized the administration's interrogation policies, said he was heartened by Mukasey's letter, including his view that the Detainee Treatment Act, passed by Congress last year, bars waterboarding in military interrogations. The act does not cover CIA interrogations.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/30/AR2007103001481.html
June 2007: The Democrats smiled, and Graham said, 'They're not going away. Now, there's a bunch of us over here. Good luck ignoring us. ... We're at 20 percent (in the polls), and we deserve it. ... I can't believe there's 20 percent of the American people that like what were doing up here, because we're doing nothing but talking about what we won't do.'http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/06/30/MNGSCQOVNF1.DTL
June 2007: Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, said: “America needs an immigration system that can compete for the best minds that exist in the world. The new system does it better than the old system.”http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/05/washington/05immig.html
February 2007: In a panel discussion Monday night after the screening of an HBO movie about the Abu Ghraib prison abuse, Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), a leading proponent of the Military Commissions Act, said he stands behind the existing law and believes that it will stand up to Supreme Court scrutiny.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/13/AR2007021301163.html
January 2007: 'Right now, you have two different standards for people doing the same job,' said Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), who pushed the provision. 'This will bring uniformity to the commander's ability to control the behavior of people representing our country.'http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/14/AR2007011400906.html
January 2006: Most of the discussion of executive power on Monday came from Democratic senators. One Republican, Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, argued for an aggressive view of executive power.http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/10/politics/politicsspecial1/10legal.html
November 2005: The compromise links legislation written by Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), which would deny detainees broad access to federal courts, with a new measure authored by Sen. Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.) that would grant detainees the right to appeal the verdict of a military tribunal to a federal appeals court. The deal will come to a vote today, and the authors say they are confident it will pass.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/14/AR2005111401508.html
November 2005: When that tack did not work -- 90 senators supported the measure -- Cheney handed McCain language that would exempt the CIA. Despite Cheney's concerns, Graham said he has not heard any concerns from the CIA suggesting it needs an exemption from the McCain amendment. The CIA declined to comment.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/06/AR2005110601281.html
Role Name Type Last Updated Member of (past or present) Republican Party (U.S.) / Republican National Committee Organization Dec 23, 2005 Member of (past or present) US Air Force (USAF) Organization Dec 23, 2005 Member of (past or present) US House of Representatives Organization Dec 23, 2005 Member of (past or present) US Senate Organization Dec 23, 2005 Student/Trainee (past or present) University of South Carolina Organization Dec 23, 2005
Articles and Resources
39 Articles and Resources. Go to: [Next 19]
Date Fairness.com Resource Read it at: Dec 18, 2013 Military retirees 'screwed' in budget deal
QUOTE: Military retirees stand to lose a full percentage point from their cost-of-living raises when they retire after a minimum of 20 years of service....House budget chief Rep. Paul Ryan's website states that military retirement "provides an exceptionally generous benefit, often providing 40 years of pension payments in return for 20 years of service," in an explainer on why benefits should be trimmed.
CNN (Cable News Network) Oct 05, 2013 A Federal Budget Crisis Months in the Planning
QUOTE: interviews with a wide array of conservatives show that the confrontation that precipitated the crisis was the outgrowth of a long-running effort to undo the law, the Affordable Care Act, since its passage in 2010 — waged by a galaxy of conservative groups with more money, organized tactics and interconnections than is commonly known.
New York Times Nov 29, 2012 U.N. Assembly, in Blow to U.S., Elevates Status of Palestine
QUOTE: More than 130 countries voted on Thursday to upgrade Palestine to a nonmember observer state of the United Nations....The new status will give the Palestinians more tools to challenge Israel in international legal forums for its occupation activities in the West Bank, including settlement-building...
New York Times Feb 08, 2011 Students in Legal Limbo After Immigration Fight
QUOTE: ...thousands of immigrant students who declared their illegal status during a nationwide campaign for a bill in Congress that would have put them on a path to legal residence.... leaves students like her who might have benefited from the bill — an estimated 1.2 million nationwide — in a legal twilight.
New York Times May 21, 2010 Detainees Barred From Access to U.S. Courts
QUOTE: A federal appeals court ruled Friday that three men who had been detained by the United States military for years without trial in Afghanistan had no recourse to American courts. The decision was a broad victory for the Obama administration in its efforts to hold terrorism suspects overseas for indefinite periods without judicial oversight.
New York Times Apr 23, 2010 U.S.’s Toughest Immigration Law Is Signed in Arizona
QUOTE: Gov. Jan Brewer of Arizona signed the toughest illegal immigration bill in the country into law on Friday, aimed at identifying, prosecuting and deporting illegal immigrants. The governor’s move unleashed immediate protests and reignited the divisive battle over immigration reform nationally. Even before she signed the bill at a 4:30 p.m. news conference here, President Obama strongly criticized it.
New York Times May 23, 2009 Nuance Is Fine Until It’s a Flip-Flop
QUOTE: It was the kind of careful, nuanced argument...a methodical laying-out of the facts by a president who seems convinced that if he simply explains himself to the American people, they will surely understand his position and forgive him for changing his mind. It is a tactic Mr. Obama has employed repeatedly as president...
New York Times May 22, 2008 Fear of Troop Exodus Fuels Debate on G.I. Bill
QUOTE: With the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan far from over, President Bush is threatening to veto a bill that would pay tuition and other expenses at a four-year public university for anyone who has served in the military for at least three years since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. A main reason is the fear that it would hasten an exodus from the ranks.
New York Times Nov 09, 2007 Border issue vexes Congress: Facing a tight budget, lawmakers are struggling to pass even popular issues like a border fence.
QUOTE: With time running out, the best prospect for any immigration measure is to be added to one of the must-pass spending bills for fiscal year 2008. But even measures with broad-based support, such as strengthening borders, are becoming grist for partisan firefights.
Christian Science Monitor Oct 31, 2007 Mukasey Losing Democrats' Backing: Nominee Unsure If Waterboarding Breaks Torture Law
QUOTE: Attorney general nominee Michael B. Mukasey told Senate Democrats yesterday that a kind of simulated drowning known as waterboarding is "repugnant to me," but he said he does not know whether the interrogation tactic violates U.S. laws against torture. Mukasey's uncertainty about the method's legality has raised new questions about the success of his nomination.
Washington Post Oct 31, 2007 Mukasey Calls Harsh Interrogation ‘Repugnant’
QUOTE: Mr. Mukasey noted that Congress has not explicitly banned waterboarding by the C.I.A., though it was outlawed for use by the military in the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005. That left room for interpretation as to whether waterboarding or any other technique is prohibited as “cruel, inhuman or degrading” treatment...
New York Times Jun 14, 2007 Congress seeks to level trade imbalances: Where critics see protectionism, others see hope of more sustainable commerce.
QUOTE: As Congress considers how to tackle America's gaping trade deficit, a central question is this: Will the cure be worse than the problem? …Critics of such measures warn that they create at least the appearance of protectionism …[while] Supporters say Congress needs to act to maintain American living standards…
Christian Science Monitor Jun 08, 2007 A 'Failure of Leadership': Congress flounders on immigration reform, prompting an angry outcry from business and workers
QUOTE: On June 8, in the wake of the Senate's failure to push forward an immigration reform bill, union groups, high-tech companies, restaurant owners, and contractors all raised their voices in protest.
BusinessWeek Jun 04, 2007 A Point System for Immigrants Incites Passions
QUOTE: The point system, one of the most significant features of the Senate immigration bill, will be at the heart of the debate as Congress resumes work on the legislation after a weeklong recess. It has already stirred passions because it would profoundly change the criteria for picking future immigrants.
New York Times Feb 16, 2007 Backlash grows against free trade: A record US trade deficit is rekindling the globalization debate.
QUOTE: "There was a time 10 years ago when it seemed like globalization was consensual, and there were very few remaining questions about whether it was ... a good thing," says Jeffry Frieden, an expert on global economics at Harvard University. The reality, he says, includes a caveat: Trade "can make everyone better off, so long as you compensate the losers."
Christian Science Monitor Feb 14, 2007 Bill Would Restore Detainees' Rights, Define 'Combatant'
QUOTE: The bill would also prevent the executive branch from making blanket determinations about who is an enemy combatant and would restrict the president's authority to interpret when certain human rights standards apply to detainees. The legislation would limit the label "enemy combatant" to a person "who directly participates in hostilities in a zone of active combat against the United States" or who took part in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Washington Post Jan 15, 2007 New Law Could Subject Civilians to Military Trial: Provision Aimed at Contractors, but Some Fear It Will Sweep Up Other Workers
QUOTE: Private contractors and other civilians serving with U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan could be subject for the first time to military courts-martial under a new federal provision...intended to close a long-standing loophole that critics say puts contractors in war zones above the law. But the provision also could affect others accompanying U.S. forces in the field, including civilian government employees and embedded journalists.
Washington Post Oct 19, 2006 Torture of detainees? No. 'Coercion'? It depends. New detainee law gives the White House and the CIA most – but not all – of the authority they wanted for interrogations.
QUOTE: legal and other experts say the new law does not give the White House - and the CIA - the clear and broad authorization the president had requested....What the president won was a congressional endorsement of the concept of using coercive interrogations - provided the techniques are not too extreme.
Christian Science Monitor Sep 08, 2006 Bush moves to shore up war-on-terror credentials
QUOTE: Bush's speeches demonstrate the power of the presidential bully pulpit, even for a chief executive struggling in the polls. And in the first week of the fall campaign, marked by the traditional Labor Day kickoff, they confirm a political strategy long telegraphed by Bush adviser Karl Rove: to make heavy use of the terrorism issue for the third election in a row.
Christian Science Monitor Sep 07, 2006 A Sudden Sense of Urgency
QUOTE: Mr. Bush could have prevented this sort of miscarriage of justice if he had not insisted on creating his own system of military tribunals, which the Supreme Court ruled illegal. Even now, the legislation he is proposing to handle Guantánamo prisoners would undermine key principles of justice. It would permit the use of evidence obtained through coercion, along with hearsay evidence, and evidence that is kept secret from the accused.
New York Times
39 Articles and Resources. Go to: [Next 19]
- Arts & Humanities
- Businesses & Organizations
- Computers & Information Technology
- Family & Friends & Interpersonal
- Government & Politics / History
- Health & Medicine
- Law & Justice
- Media & Journalism
- Personal Finance & Career
- Philosophy & Religion
- Recreation & Entertainment
- Science & Technology
- Social Sciences & Groups
- Arctic / Antarctic / Greenland
- Central America / Caribbean
- Eurasia / Central Asia
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania / AustralAsia
- South America
- About Fairness.com
- Contact Us
- Conditions of Service
- Fair Use Notice
- Advisory Board
Not a current user? Sign up!